Saturday, May 05, 2007

The Lost Marilyn's Movie (???)

LINK quote [In 1980, a Swedish photographer discovered a 16mm hardcore sex short film from around 1948, purportedly featuring a young Marilyn Monroe. Supporters of the theory that the woman in the film is indeed Monroe point to FBI files in which Joe DiMaggio is reported to have offered twenty-five thousand dollars for a print of a "French-type" movie ostensibly featuring Monroe "in unnatural acts with an unknown male"].
(via softblog)


  1. Mike Stajduhar2:17 AM

    This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. There are several clear close-ups of her face. I can't imagine how anyone could ever belive this is Marilyn.

  2. Dear Mike, this is not "stupid"... it's "weird".

  3. You know, that very well could be her- before any work (did Monroe have any cosmetic surgery? Because the nose is one of the only facial difference. She's younger, heavier, and not wearing as much eye make-up as she did later in her career.

    That was more of Monroe than I ever cared to see, lol.

  4. Anonymous1:47 AM

    Omg, I have seen several photos and videos of Marilyn from 1948. This is NOT her, omg. Deffinetly not!

  5. Anonymous5:16 PM

    this is fucking stuoid and so disrespectful to monroe it clearlyisnt her she gorgeous and the gurl in the video needs a nose job

  6. Anonymous3:05 PM

    stop whining, this is fucking hot, stop whining, start mastrubating :D

  7. That's not Marilyn. Even as Norma Jean Mortensen, before she was famous and dyed her brown hair blonde, she wasn't that heavy. I've seen pictures of her from that period. Also, Marilyn's first film (in 1947) predates this film.

  8. Bret Ludwig9:26 AM

    The teeth. The best way to establish a positive ID is the teeth. If we could get a frame grab of the teeth, scale, and match to photos of Marilyn, we'd have a good answer.

    The chin and nose are the biggest differences but they are where she did have work.

    Personally I'm not sure what I think. Deserves pro analysis.